Should I play one more year or walk away?

The 30-second answer

Run the honest math: what the extra year pays after taxes, what it risks in health and future earning power, and what starting the second career a year earlier is worth. 'One more year' is a financial decision long before it is an emotional one.

Price the year honestly — both sides of it

Start with what the extra year actually pays: contract or NIL money after taxes, fees, and the costs of staying in playing shape. That's the visible side. Then price the invisible side:

• Health risk. Another season is another season of injury exposure — and post-career health has its own financial cost, in medical bills and in what your body lets you do next.
• The second career's clock. Every year you delay starting the next chapter is a year of building seniority, income growth, and relationships you don't get back. A $300k playing year that delays a career with decades of compounding growth can be a worse trade than it looks.
• Your platform's peak. Your name is most valuable while you're still playing. Some doors open easier this year than they will two years after you walk away.

Know what the year is really for

Some athletes need one more year financially — the foundation isn't built yet, and the money genuinely changes their future. Others are financially done and playing for the love of it, which is a completely legitimate reason if you name it honestly. The dangerous version is the middle: telling yourself it's about money when the math says it isn't, because the locker room is easier to face than the question of what comes next.

Run the walk-away test

Before deciding, know your number: what your life costs per year, what your savings can sustainably support, and how big the gap is. If there's no gap, the decision is purely about what you want — and that clarity alone changes how you play the year, negotiate the contract, and protect your body. If there is a gap, the year has a job to do, and the plan for the money should exist before the season starts.

Why this matters

This is the last big earning decision of a playing career, and it sets up the longest financial phase of your life — the decades after sports. Athletes who decide by feel often either leave real money on the table or pay for one more season with their health and a delayed start on everything that comes next.

What changes the answer

• Whether your post-career life is already funded, or the extra year closes a real gap
• How much of the year's pay is guaranteed versus incentive-based
• Your injury history and what another season realistically risks
• What the second career pays and how much starting a year earlier compounds
• Whether your family situation needs the income or needs you home

An example

Illustrative example, not a real client.

A 33-year-old veteran is offered one more year at $1.1M, roughly $600k after taxes and fees. His family's life costs $150k a year, and his portfolio can already sustain that. The money is real but changes nothing structural. What changes his answer is the other column: a broadcasting opportunity open now that may not be open in two years, and a knee with two surgeries on it. He walks — not because the math said the year was worthless, but because the math showed him what the year was actually for.

Common mistakes

• Deciding emotionally in the offseason, then reverse-engineering the money story
• Counting incentive money as guaranteed when pricing the year
• Ignoring what a year's delay costs the second career over decades
• Not knowing your annual cost of living — so no one can tell you if you're done
• Letting people whose income depends on you playing frame the decision

Questions to ask before you decide

• What does my life actually cost per year, and can my savings already sustain it?
• What does this year pay after taxes, fees, and staying-ready costs — guaranteed only?
• What is the realistic health cost of one more season, in my sport, at my age?
• What opportunity is open to me right now that might not be open in two years?
• If money were fully off the table, what would I choose — and why isn't that my answer?

What to do next

1. Calculate your walk-away number: annual cost of living versus what savings can sustain.
2. Price the year: guaranteed after-tax pay, minus the costs of playing it.
3. Write down what the second career path pays and what a one-year delay costs it.
4. Get an independent read from someone with no financial stake in you playing.
5. Decide before the season pressures decide for you — and build the money plan to match.

When to bring in a pro

CPA: To model the after-tax value of the final year and plan the income cliff — the year after retirement often has very different tax opportunities.

Advisor: Before you decide: this is exactly the moment a sustainable withdrawal plan gets built, and the answer changes whether you need the year at all.

Pam's take

I ask every athlete facing this the same question: if the money were handled, what would you want? Half discover they're done and relieved to say it. The other half discover they want to play — and once we've confirmed the foundation is built, they go play the year free, because it's a choice instead of a need. Either answer is right. Not knowing which one is yours is the only wrong place to be.

Written by Pam Rodriguez, CFP®.

Build your next step

Explore more athlete money questions · See the Athlete Wealth System™ · Apply to work with us